Lawyer
Trần Việt Tùng
Managing Partner
Civil & Corporate
10 years of experience
Contracts
Businesses signing or managing contracts in Vietnam should verify that payment milestones, acceptance procedures, liability allocation and termination rights match the actual transaction. Justix drafts contracts, reviews counterparty templates and prepares negotiation positions for specific agreements. Clients receive marked-up wording, risk comments and a practical signing checklist. Fees and delivery dates are agreed after reviewing the documents.
A standard form may give the drafting party broad termination rights or holdbacks while requiring the other party to accept extensive indemnities. Management needs a defensible list of changes before approval.
The agreement requires an acceptance certificate or supporting records inconsistent with actual operations. Even completed work may become difficult to invoice or collect without a workable evidence process.
Quotes, purchase orders, scope documents and the legal draft describe different specifications or delivery dates. The company risks delivering extra work without an agreed price or change order.
A broad warranty, confidentiality or indemnity clause may expose the business beyond the value of the transaction. Decision-makers need an assessment of enforceability, potential losses and alternatives.
The proposed signatory, entity details, licences or mandatory formalities have not been checked. This may affect whether obligations can be enforced or performed as intended.
Regional headquarters, the Vietnam business and the counterparty circulate competing redlines. Without one approved version and a decision log, important concessions may be lost before signature.
The project scope or timetable has changed, but the parties rely on informal emails. The company needs a controlled amendment or termination strategy and a record of outstanding obligations.
Review the proposed goods or services, delivery model, commercial terms and operational evidence available to the client.
Review available entity and signatory information, authority documents and any relevant licensing or mandatory-form requirements.
Prepare a new agreement or revise contracts, schedules, purchase orders and related transaction documents.
Assess acceptance, payment, warranties, liability, confidentiality, changes, termination and dispute resolution under applicable law.
Explain key risks, provide alternative wording and distinguish commercial decisions requiring management approval.
Attend discussions if agreed, consolidate approved revisions and provide execution and post-signing checkpoints.
Lawyer
Managing Partner
Civil & Corporate
10 years of experience
LL.M.
Head of Corporate Legal Affairs & Contracts
Corporate legal affairs, contracts and employment law
10 years of experience
Jurist
Head of Corporate Legal Department – Licensing and Administrative Procedures
Intellectual Property & Corporate
9 years of experience
Chuyên gia
Cố vấn
15 years of experience
Provide the latest draft, commercial documents, key emails, transaction objectives and desired deadline.
Justix confirms documents, languages, proposed revision rounds and whether participation in negotiations is included.
Lawyers analyse the proposed obligations and issue tracked changes with practical explanations of material risks.
Management confirms priorities; Justix supports counterparty correspondence or negotiation within the approved mandate.
Justix provides the revised version and any remaining issues, with a list of evidence and deadlines to monitor after signing.
Timeline
The delivery schedule is confirmed after reviewing the agreement, supporting documents and expected negotiation or revision rounds.
Timing depends on contract length, complexity, languages, counterparty feedback and urgency. The proposed delivery milestones are stated in the quotation.
Fees
Justix quotes by agreement type, document volume, legal complexity, language requirements and negotiation support. The quotation sets out revision rounds and exclusions; extra work requires prior agreement.
How our fees workCompanies signing contracts in Vietnam should check whether the agreement can actually be performed and evidenced by their teams. Payment conditions, acceptance records, change controls and liability clauses deserve particular attention before management approves the final text.
Justix drafts agreements, reviews counterparties' standard forms and prepares negotiation positions for individual transactions. The agreed deliverables may include tracked changes, alternative clauses, an issues list and a signing checklist. Scope, turnaround and fees are confirmed after document review.
A contract review should cover the real scope of goods or services, price and taxes, acceptance and invoicing evidence, warranties, service levels if agreed, remedies for breach, confidentiality, variations, termination and dispute resolution. The legal text should be checked against purchase orders, quotations and how the operating team works.
Article 398 of Vietnam's Civil Code 2015 recognises the parties' freedom to agree contractual content. The validity of a transaction still depends on the conditions in Article 117 and applicable form requirements. Official Civil Code text (Vietnamese).
Illustrative example: a Vietnam service provider invoices only after signed acceptance certificates, but its customer normally approves completed work by email. The service provider may have finished the work without holding the stipulated payment evidence. The agreement should define acceptance criteria, review periods, documentary alternatives and a practicable escalation process.
Justix assesses how these clauses interact with operational processes and proposes wording that management can evaluate before approaching the counterparty.
The client's authorised personnel retain responsibility for commercial decisions and execution. Justix does not agree price changes, liability caps or concessions on the client's behalf without a mandate.
Statements of work, purchase orders, email confirmations and appendices may contain binding commercial terms or create inconsistencies. The agreement should state document precedence, change approval and which version is intended for signature. Articles 403 and 404 of the Civil Code address appendices and contract interpretation. Civil Code source.
Where parties use electronic contracting, the legal treatment of data messages and electronic signatures must be assessed under the Law on Electronic Transactions 2023 and any sector-specific rules.
Penalties, indemnities and limitations cannot be evaluated without the contract type and governing law. Vietnamese commercial arrangements may be subject to specific mandatory rules under the Commercial Law 2005; different transactions may have different limits or formalities. The review should also address breach notices, cure opportunities where agreed, outstanding work, return of materials and payment upon termination.
Depending on the scope, clients receive a new draft or redline, a practical risk summary, negotiation alternatives and an agreed final version. The handover highlights records and deadlines to monitor during performance. Companies seeking a whole library of repeat-use templates should commission that as a separate standardisation project rather than assuming it is included in a one-contract review.
A widely used template may still allocate risk heavily to its drafter. The review should focus on enforceable payment conditions, deliverables, acceptance, liability and termination.
Yes. The business should provide the proposed transaction, parties, deliverables, commercial terms and implementation plan. Justix prepares a draft within the agreed scope.
Often, subject to the contract and applicable law. A valid amendment or termination requires the appropriate agreement or legal basis; one party cannot assume it may change every term unilaterally.
If included in the engagement. The company should identify its authorised decision-maker, non-negotiable terms and acceptable concessions before discussions.
The review can cover agreed language versions. The parties should specify which version controls if texts diverge. Professional translation or certification is separate unless included.
Electronic form is not automatically invalid. The legal effect of data messages and electronic signatures depends on the Law on Electronic Transactions 2023 and any transaction-specific form requirements.
Not always. Rules depend on the contract type, applicable law, mandatory limitations and the wording of the clause. A risk assessment must be transaction-specific.
Send the latest draft or transaction outline, relevant commercial documents, required languages, target deadline and expected negotiation support.
The timeline is confirmed once the documents and scope have been assessed. Time-sensitive signing deadlines should be flagged at submission.
No. It helps identify exposure and clarify obligations, but outcomes still depend on performance, evidence and how the parties act after signature.
Industries
Talk to a Justix lawyer about your options, timeline and fees before you decide.