Lawyer
Trần Việt Tùng
Managing Partner
Civil & Corporate
10 years of experience
Personal Data Protection
Justix helps foreign-invested companies and international businesses assess their Vietnam personal data obligations, map processing activities and prepare a locally grounded DPIA dossier. Our scope covers legal review, dossier preparation, filing support and one round of clarification or supplementation, as agreed in the engagement.
Assess the relevant Vietnam entity, processing roles and applicable dossier obligations before recommending the scope of work; examine any claimed exemption against the actual circumstances.
Map the processing activities covered by the engagement: data categories, individuals concerned, purposes, systems, recipients, retention practices and access by group companies or vendors.
Review the available privacy notices, consent records, processing agreements, internal policies and technical descriptions; identify inconsistencies between the documents and actual operations.
Prepare the impact assessment report and supporting dossier within the agreed scope, including processing descriptions, data flows, risk analysis and documented safeguards. Separate existing controls from improvements still to be implemented.
Support execution and submission, track receipt and assist with one round of clarification or supplementation within the agreed dossier scope. Assess cross-border transfer work separately where relevant.
Review the initial information, identify the relevant processing roles and discuss the assessment perimeter. Agree the deliverables, timetable, responsibilities and fee before substantive preparation begins.
Use a document checklist to gather input from legal, HR, operations and IT. Identify who can confirm group systems, vendor arrangements and cross-border access, and record outstanding questions.
Draft the report and assemble the supporting documents. Explain material inconsistencies, missing evidence and measures requiring implementation; the company reviews and confirms factual accuracy.
Resolve agreed comments, prepare the execution set and support submission under the engagement. Confirm the applicable filing format and any translation requirements before finalisation.
Track receipt, assist with one round of clarification or supplementation within scope and provide the dossier for retention. Explain which operational changes should trigger a review of update obligations.
Timeline
Indicative preparation period: 15–30 days; the project schedule is confirmed in the proposal.
The agreed schedule specifies the information required, start date, draft delivery and revision milestones. Timing depends on the processing scope and document readiness. Authority review and requests for additional information are separate from Justix’s preparation schedule; a completion or acceptance date is not guaranteed.
Fees
Indicative fee: VND 30–45 million, subject to the entity, processing scope and available documents. The reference scope includes dossier preparation, filing support, receipt follow-up and one round of clarification or supplementation. Additional dossiers, a cross-border transfer assessment, extensive policy or contract remediation, later updates and further authority requests are quoted separately where required. The proposal confirms tax treatment, translation requirements and any third-party costs before engagement.
How our fees workA Vietnam personal data processing impact assessment dossier documents how an organisation processes personal data, the risks involved and the measures used to address them. For a foreign-invested enterprise, the practical challenge is often connecting local HR, sales and operational activities with systems and decisions managed at regional or global level.
Justix Law Firm provides Vietnam legal support for assessing the obligation, preparing the dossier and supporting submission within an agreed engagement. The starting point is the company’s actual processing activities: who decides the purposes, which systems are involved, where data goes and which safeguards can be supported by evidence.
On this page, “DPIA” is used as convenient English shorthand for Vietnam’s personal data processing impact assessment dossier. The terminology should not be taken to mean that a GDPR assessment and a Vietnam dossier have identical scope, thresholds or filing requirements.
A Vietnam subsidiary may collect recruitment documents, payroll information, attendance records and benefits information while a regional team administers the HR platform. The assessment should establish who determines each purpose, which entities access the records, what information leaves the local system and how retention and deletion work. A group policy alone may not explain these local arrangements.
Sales, customer support and marketing teams may use the same database for different purposes. The relevant questions include which data was collected for a transaction, how additional uses are communicated, what choices are recorded and which providers receive the information. These questions help identify the documents and operating practices that need to be reflected in the dossier.
Factories and offices may process information through visitor registration, access controls, CCTV, recruitment providers and outsourced payroll. The project should identify the actual systems and categories of data rather than limit the inventory to the corporate website. Technical teams should confirm system capabilities; the dossier should not describe a control as implemented merely because it appears in a template.
Map storage, backups, remote access and onward sharing across the group and vendor chain. This information supports the processing assessment and helps determine whether a separate cross-border transfer review is needed. The two workstreams should be coordinated, with their deliverables and fees stated separately where applicable.
These are illustrative business scenarios, not descriptions of identified Justix clients or claims about completed projects.
Before drafting, the business needs an agreed assessment perimeter: the legal entity, activities and systems covered, the responsible internal contacts and the documents available. If several Vietnam entities use one group platform, their respective roles and responsibilities should be examined rather than assuming one document automatically covers the entire group.
Justix starts with the documents and operational facts needed to determine the assignment. Our service combines legal review, structured information collection and preparation of the agreed dossier. For complex software environments, technical input may be coordinated with the company’s IT team and, where included in the project, a technology adviser.
The proposal defines the deliverables, assumptions and responsibilities before work begins. This matters where a company needs both a filing dossier and wider remediation of its privacy notices, contracts or internal procedures: those tasks should be identified explicitly instead of being left as an open-ended promise.
The company remains responsible for confirming the accuracy of its operations and implementing measures assigned to it. Legal review does not replace a technical security audit or penetration test. Justix’s commitment is to the agreed professional work, clear reporting of gaps and defined support; regulatory acceptance is not guaranteed.
Share existing group assessments, policies and processing agreements at the scoping stage. They can provide a useful starting point for identifying systems, recipients and responsibilities. The review then asks what applies to the Vietnam entity, what differs in local operations and what evidence or documentation remains missing.
Confirm the language of working documents, final filing materials and any management summary in the proposal. An English service page does not make translation, certification or a separate bilingual deliverable automatically part of the fee. This keeps procurement expectations aligned with the work commissioned.
The published reference fee is VND 30–45 million, subject to scope and document readiness. The reference engagement includes dossier preparation, filing support, follow-up on receipt and one round of clarification or supplementation within the agreed scope.
The indicative preparation period is 15–30 days. The proposal confirms how this period is counted, the start conditions and draft/revision milestones. Time spent awaiting company information and the authority’s review should be addressed separately; the preparation estimate is not a promise of regulatory acceptance within that period.
Additional entities or dossiers, a separate cross-border transfer assessment, extensive policy or contract drafting, translation work and later changes should be scoped expressly. Tax treatment and any third-party costs should also be confirmed in the written quote.
The core sources for this service are Vietnam’s Law on Personal Data Protection No. 91/2025/QH15 and Decree No. 356/2025/ND-CP, effective from 1 January 2026. Article 19 of the Decree addresses the processing impact assessment dossier; Article 20 concerns updates; Article 41 sets out conditional arrangements for specified business categories.
Under Article 42, Decree 356 replaces Decree 13/2023/ND-CP. A project based on earlier documentation therefore needs a review of the current framework and the treatment of any previous submission, rather than simply changing the date on an old template.
After handover, designate an internal owner to track changes in purposes, parties, systems and business activities and obtain advice on whether an update is required. Retaining a copy of the dossier is only part of that process. This page provides general service information; the applicable obligations depend on the facts and law relevant to the engagement.
For an initial scope discussion, email legal@justix.vn with your Vietnam entity’s business activities, the main types of personal data processed, relevant systems and overseas arrangements, any existing dossier, and your intended project timeline. You can also call +84 372 717 888 or +84 878 853 686.
A high-level description is enough to begin. Please do not send employee identity documents, customer databases, passwords or other sensitive records with the initial enquiry. Justix can first clarify the information needed, the appropriate scope and how further documents should be provided.
Foreign ownership alone does not determine the answer. The review considers the entity, its actual processing activities and roles, and any applicable statutory exception. Article 19 of Decree 356/2025/ND-CP addresses dossiers for controllers, controller-processors and processors. Justix checks the local facts before proposing the work, including employee data and activities supported by overseas group systems.
Existing group documents are useful starting material, but they should not be treated as an automatic substitute for a Vietnam dossier. The local entity, processing activities, parties, data flows and supporting documents must be checked against Vietnamese requirements. Justix can use the group’s materials to identify what is reusable and what requires local clarification or adaptation within the agreed scope.
For entities subject to the obligation, Article 19 of Decree 356/2025/ND-CP provides for preparation and retention from the start of processing and submission within 60 days of commencing processing. Existing operations require a review of their commencement date, earlier filings and applicable transitional provisions. Do not assume that engaging an adviser restarts a statutory deadline.
A processing impact assessment and a cross-border transfer impact assessment address different obligations. Overseas storage, group access and vendor arrangements should be mapped and assessed rather than classified solely by the supplier’s address. This service does not automatically include a separate transfer dossier; Justix identifies the issue during scoping and proposes additional work if appropriate.
A small headcount is not enough to establish an exemption. Article 41 of Decree 356/2025/ND-CP contains conditional arrangements for certain small, startup and micro businesses, with exclusions concerning data-processing services, direct processing of sensitive data and the specified scale of processing. The business classification and actual activities need checking; any relief must be assessed separately for each obligation.
Submission is followed by the authority’s assessment and may lead to a request for clarification or supplementation. The reference service includes one round within the agreed scope; additional requests or changed operations are scoped separately. Justix does not guarantee acceptance or a particular regulatory outcome. The company should retain the dossier and review changes in purposes, parties or business activities for any update obligation under Article 20 of Decree 356/2025/ND-CP.
Lawyer
Managing Partner
Civil & Corporate
10 years of experience
Tiến sĩ Luật
Legal Adviser
International Trade
25 years of experience
Thạc sĩ Luật
Trưởng Phòng Pháp chế & Hợp đồng
Tư vấn doanh nghiệp, hợp đồng
10 years of experience
Jurist
Head of Corporate Legal Department – Licensing and Administrative Procedures
Intellectual Property & Corporate
9 years of experience
Kỹ sư công nghệ
Cố vấn kỹ thuật về bảo vệ dữ liệu cá nhân
Công nghệ thông tin & bảo vệ Dữ liệu cá nhân
10 years of experience
Talk to a Justix lawyer about your options, timeline and fees before you decide.